How good is each Dragon Quest game for a beginner? Mainline Edition.

1737214708481.jpeg

Hey, it’s about that time of the day again! That is, another Dragon Quest article. Frankly I should write more about this franchise.

When you try to get into a franchise as a beginner, there’s always the same question: what’s a good game to start with? A lot of people will tell you that you go with the one that interests you the most, but sometimes it’s not that easy. If it’s a franchise like Yakuza, you can’t just start with another game that isn’t 0 or 1, because all of the games cover an overarching story and depend on previous knowledge of events and characters.

Others, like Final Fantasy, do allow for that “rule”, but even then, it’s not as simple because not all games are equally good for someone who wants to get into the franchise. This is mainly because of the differences in quality between games: whether it’s because some games are more punishing than others or simply because they are just not as good, knowing which game to start with is crucial to truly enjoy the franchise and become a fan. Luckily, Dragon Quest enters in that second group, so it’s my duty to let you all know which games are the best to start with.

Without further ado, this is my set of answers if you were to ask me “I wanna get into Dragon Quest, is [X] good?”. Mainline edition!

DRAGON QUEST​

1737216340246.jpeg

  • Recommended platforms: SNES, GBC, Switch. HD remake might be good when it comes out.
  • Verdict: Mixed bag.
The first title in the series is… not a bad point of start! More or less. The game has a lot of impressive qualities. For starters, it’s very short: you could beat it in an evening if you know what you are doing. It features a lot of what makes Dragon Quest great, albeit in a smaller scale. It’s very charming! It’s legendary. It’s Dragon Quest 1…

…But at the same time I genuinely think that if this were your first Dragon Quest game, unless you have a penchant for older, jankier JRPGs, or are very experienced with the genre (and even then, I have my doubts), it wculd put you away from the franchise. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a good game. But I also think it’s a bit overrated? Regardless of its importance and how well it does things for how small it is, it takes some perspective to truly appreciate it for what it is, and until then, it’s not that interesting. That being said, if you truly feel like you need to start with the first one, then go ahead. There are worse choices. Such as…

DRAGON QUEST II: LUMINARIES OF THE LEGENDARY LINE​

1737216353287.jpeg

  • Recommended platforms: same as Dragon Quest.
  • Verdict: NO!!!
Dragon Quest II is easily the worst mainline game in the series as well as one of the worst in the franchise. What could have been a solid improvement over the first game quickly turned into a mess that’s defined by its design and its quirks. In a few areas, it’s better than the first game, by introducing the concept of a party (only three members, though) a ship to move through masses of water, more levels and more skills. Unfortunately, that’s where the fun ends. The game is grindy to hell. The first one was already grindy enough, but at least in that game it felt like a checkpoint so as not to accidentally make a 2-hour long game. In this game it feels more like a cruel joke: you’re constantly underleveled for no real reason other than “it’s an NES JRPG”. The biggest offender is the endgame: just traversing the path towards the final dungeon requires grinding itself! I had to grind a whole evening just to get past this garbage part. To top it off, you’re constantly lost, and unlike other games in the series where this happens, it’s not fun. It sucks.

Do you know what’s one of the first things you do in this game? Searching for the second party member by cycling through three towns several times, only for him to be in the first town you visit. That tells you everything about this game.

I heard in an interview with the developers that this game wasn’t play-tested. While I can’t attest for the veracity of this statement, I like to think it’s true, because it shows. Fuck this game. Also, it’s a sequel of the first game, but it’s not like it matters in this particular case.

DRAGON QUEST III: SEEDS OF SALVATION​

1737216145018.jpeg

  • Recommended platforms: SNES, GBC, Switch
  • Verdict: yes.
Dragon Quest III is the most important JRPG ever. Period. Even more than the first Dragon Quest or Final Fantasy VII. It has a great legacy behind it, and that legacy is bound to attract some curious gamers. Fortunately for them, Dragon Quest III is completely accessible as a first entry! I wouldn’t say it’s the best, but it’s a very good entry point. Despite the fact that it’s a pretty old JRPG, it still holds up pretty well because the core design is very good. Although you’re not given much direction once you get the ship, it’s not difficult to find out where you have to go to next because of how well designed the world is, especially in the remakes. The job system is very simple, but very satisfying and allows you to build your characters the way you like.

DRAGON QUEST III HD-2D REMAKE​

1737216313943.jpeg

  • Recommended platforms: any.
  • Verdict: yes, but…
I wanted to put the HD remake in here to separate it from the other remakes due to several reasons. The HD remake very much feels like Dragon Quest III. It has a lot of QoL features that are great for beginners but unfortunately break the core designs of the base game. The good news is that those features can be deactivated if you want a more authentic experience. You can also choose not to press the map button as well (it’s hard to resist the temptation, though) and you can always not make a character with the new class, Monster Master.

In conclusion: if this is your very first Dragon Quest, go for it. If you have played other games before, please try out the SNES or Switch remakes first.

DRAGON QUEST IV: CHAPTERS OF THE CHOSEN​

1737216258035.png

  • Recommended platforms: Nintendo DS. PlayStation if you know Japanese.
  • Verdict: mixed bag.
Dragon Quest IV is far from a bad entry to the series, don’t get me wrong, but I think that there are better ways of experiencing the franchise. A friend of mine went through this title the past year and found it a very underwhelming experience, mostly because the early chapters before the main one have some unsavory flags that can halt your progress if you don’t activate them properly. While that’s definitely an issue (mostly because of its NES design), the real problem is that it’s just not very interesting. The chapter structure was unique when it came out, but nowadays it’s not much. The party members aren’t very interesting gameplay wise and there’s even powercreep between them. Borya, Meena and to an extent Ragnar feel like inferior versions of Maya, Kyril and Alena, and Torneko doesn’t go anywhere. The story is middling, but I feel like it has an interesting, albeit simple, antagonist. If it interests you, however, you can go for this one.

DRAGON QUEST V: THE HAND OF THE HEAVENLY BRIDE​

1737216240048.jpeg

  • Recommended platforms: PS2, Nintendo DS.
  • Verdict: YESSSSSS!!! (with one small “but”)
Dragon Quest V is one of the best JRPGs ever, while also serving as a great entry point to the franchise. A combination of great writing, great story, good characters and a gameplay that brings back the monster catching genre after being created by Megami Tensei (granted, it’s not very well developed and falls off late game) and one of the best soundtracks in the series, Dragon Quest V is something that everybody should experience in every lifetime.

In fact, it’s so good that starting with it could be a problem. You start with the peak and it’s all downhill now matter what path you take. A pity!

DRAGON QUEST VI: REALMS OF REVERIE/REVELATION​

1737216218336.jpeg

  • Recommended platforms: Nintendo DS. SNES if you’re a nerd.
  • Verdict: Mixed bag, leaning to “no”.
While I’m an avid defender of this game (personally it’s one of my favorite Dragon Quests), it has its flaws. For starters, it feels too similar to Dragon Quest III in its structure and its presence of a job system. That in itself isn’t bad, because Dragon Quest III is good. However, where Seeds of Salvation excels, Realms of Revelation fails. The world isn’t as tightly designed, especially with the presence of the upper world. As a result, once you get the ship, it’s much easier to get lost in comparison to the third game, so it’s less beginner friendly. The story is fine but it’s lacking in certain parts, feeling somewhat segmented; a major stepdown from V. However, the main problem is the characters: most of them are very underdeveloped, and thew that are developed are lackluster. Gameplay-wise it’s fine, the job system does its thing as it’s supposed to do it. It has some very good songs here and there, at least.

DRAGON QUEST VII: FRAGMENTS OF A FORGOTTEN PAST​

1737216062195.jpeg

  • Recommended platforms: both PlayStation and 3DS are fine, but 3DS goes straight to the point faster.
  • Verdict: no.
Unfortunately for Fragments of a Forgotten Past, its unique anime-like structure is its demise. Rather than focusing on a big, overarching story like previous titles, Dragon Quest VII prefers to tell you small stories in each of the islands you visit. Some of these stories are pretty good, actually. The problem is that the game is absurdly long for no real reason: over 70 hours on 3DS and close to 100 in PSX! This wouldn’t be a problem if the gameplay was fun, but you don’t even get access to the job system until 20 hours in! And until then, you’re stuck with characters who do one thing (and they don’t even do it properly!), so it gets boring fast. However, if you manage to appreciate its unique quirks, there’s something interesting below the surface. I recommend leaving this one for much later, once you’ve dived enough into the franchise and are craving some JRPG goodness.

DRAGON QUEST VIII: JOURNEY OF THE CURSED KING​

1737216161596.jpeg

  • Recommended platforms: PS2 for aesthetics. 3DS for QoL and content. Avoid mobile phone version!
  • Verdict: YEAH BABY THAT’S WHAT I’VE BEEN WAITING FOR.
I’m going to keep this one simple because if I start gushing about this game I’m not stopping, I love it THAT much. So, yes: the eighth entry is a great entry point. It does everything well while doing nothing particularly poorly. It’s very well rounded to the point that it’s very vanilla. If you asked a computer to create a JRPG, this would be the default product. I don’t mean this in a bad way, but it’s still true.

Probably the second-best entry in the series to be honest.

DRAGON QUEST IX: SENTINELS OF THE STARRY SKIES​

1737216189330.jpeg

  • Recommended platforms: Nintendo DS.
  • Verdict: yes.
This was the first Dragon Quest I’ve completed, so I can attest to it being a good entry point. While the story is nothing to write home about (most of what’s good can be traced back to the antagonist, which feels like a step up from Psaro the Manslayer), the key of Sentinels of the Starry Skies is the gameplay.

First of all, the game features a very rich job system. Unlike previous games, you’re not constantly switching between jobs until you unlock the more advanced ones. Instead, you settle with one until you reach level 99 (except for maybe the protagonist if you don’t to keep them as a Minstrel) because each job has its own level. While I don’t know if something in particular happens upon reaching said level, I do know that stat bonuses from the skill trees of each job is shared between all jobs, which means that, to get as strong as possible, you want to get each job to level 99. In reality, you don’t need to do this because that’s more of a late game thing, but it’s still fun. Speaking of late game, it’s immense. Perhaps overwhelming. Over a million dungeons with unique bosses and even some legacy ones! You can tell that the game was originally going to be an MMO, it’s felt in a lot of the design choices.

But, by far, the best thing about Dragon Quest IX is its co-op mode. You can beat the whole game (except the beginning until you reach the second town and one specific moment near the end of the game) with up to three friends! It’s a lot of fun, but unfortunately is local co-op only.

DRAGON QUEST X: RISE OF THE FIVE TRIBES​

1737214693971.jpeg

  • Recommended platforms: PC
  • Verdict: unsure.
Is hard to classify Dragon Quest X as a starting point. It’s an MMO that hasn’t come out of Japan despite the fact that it has existed since the Wii days. Personally, I’m not very fond of MMOs due to many reasons (although I did have some fun when I played a bit of the free trial version), so I’m not the best at recommending them. However, rest assured that this is pure Dragon Quest goodness: the combat system is perfectly translated by making it part turn-based, part action. If you like MMOs then feel free but be warned that you have to jump through several hoops to be able to play it and translate it. Also, get a good VPN service, otherwise it’s going to be a hassle.

DRAGON QUEST XI: ECHOES OF A FORGOTTEN PAST​

1737216084448.jpeg

  • Recommended platforms: any, as long as it’s the Definitive Edition. The 3DS version in particular is the most unique if you know Japanese.
  • Verdict: yes, probably the best choice.
While I’m no longer as fond of this game, it remains THE best entry for beginners so far. Featuring lower difficulty in comparison to other entries in the series, a compelling story to keep you hooked, easy to grasp but satisfying to execute mechanics, good visual presentation, good character writing and streamlined features. While I don’t necessarily agree with everything the game does, it’s still great. It also has the best combat in the series! Feels good. Beware, however, that it's a lengthy game, so if you're a bit burnout from JRPGs, leave it for later.

For veterans in the series, the Draconian Quest allows you to add several features that turn the easiest game in the series into one of the hardest. Be careful with the activation of every single one!

CONCLUSION​

1737216400421.jpeg

Whew! So many delicious choices! Can’t decide on one? Then this is my recommended ranking:
  • XI
  • VIII
  • III
  • IX/V
  • V/IX
  • VI
  • IV/I
  • I/IV
  • VII
  • II
As for X, it doesn’t really matter, you can go in whenever, it’s not like it’s a game you have to beat.

I just love this franchise so much, man. When I see someone praise a particular game in the series, I can’t help but be happy. Even if it’s a bad one like II.

Oh, but don’t think it’s just mainline games. There’s also plenty of spin-offs out there! One day I might give my opinion on them as well.

What about you? Do you like Dragon Quest? Do you agree with my opinions? Would you change something? Please, let me know in the comments if you have something of interest to say!
 
Last edited:
DUUUUDE, a dragon quest article! My jam! I certainly have a lot to add here so here goes!
View attachment 14135
Hey, it’s about that time of the day again! That is, another Dragon Quest article. Frankly I should write more about this franchise
Agreed! I probably should too haha.

I actually agree with what you said about the game! You’ve captured quite well how I felt about it. It’s a game I really like but yeah it has flaws haha. Still a sweet short game.
Dragon Quest II is easily the worst mainline game in the series as well as one of the worst in the franchise.
PREACH, it’s an inherently bad game but it’s smudged between the humble beginnings of the series as well as one of the greatest rpgs of all time! It’s more a transitional or historic game than anything else LOL. That’s how I’d describe it, ancient history. And should remain as such!

I heard in an interview with the developers that this game wasn’t play-tested.
LOOOL, checks out. The part about finding your party is very true.
Dragon Quest III is the most important JRPG ever. Period.
PREACH! I say this to my FF-poisoned friend all the time haha. He still doesn’t get it but he’s starting to warm up so theres hope! This is The most important rpg for me too! I was never an rpg fan at all before DQ3 but once I played it? Changed my whole perception of the genre, no hyperbole!
Agree on DQ4. Not a lot I can add here. My friend loved it though.
DQX is odd. I’m avoiding it for the same reasons you did. But I wanna try the offline remake! Love the chibi art! Square please stop neglecting DQ and bring more games to the rest of the world, thanks 🙏
While I’m no longer as fond of this game
Yeah I fell out of love with DQXI recently. PHENOMENAL game, but never hit the same itch DQ3, 5 and 8 did, Y’know?

Anyways, good piece! Excellently structured! Can’t wait for more haha. I really should replay the game so thanks for installing the drive in me again haha.
 
Yeah I fell out of love with DQXI recently. PHENOMENAL game, but never hit the same itch DQ3, 5 and 8 did, Y’know?
With the second playthrough I realized that the third act is not very good, and the problems that I found in the first playthrough (which I didn't mind at the time) felt more apparent
 
You need to explain why exactly Dragon Quest III is more important than Final Fantasy VII because I don't get it.
It started AND polished certain conventions from JRPGs and had a much bigger cultural impact, in my opinion.
Also Dragon Quest X started on the Wii not the WiiU.
Whoops hehe
 
It started AND polished certain conventions from JRPGs and had a much bigger cultural impact, in my opinion.

Whoops hehe
Absolutely correct. 7 doesn’t compare imo. Hopefully more people in the future recognize how big DQ3 is.
 
Great stuff! Been a fan of the series since IV on the DS, played the entire Zenethian Trilogy, then blew ahead trough VII, VIII and IX before playing XI DE on switch. I still have to play III (I know, blasphemy) but when I get the courage to, I'll most likely play the SNES version, unless there is a diference between the 2.

You said that VII was boring and couldn't recommend it as a starting point, which fair enough it does take a long time before the action starts, but personally it's my favorite of the series, I really enjoy the episodic nature of the game, and the whole setting of these random children being tasked with rebuilding the world one slab of stone at a time, really gives a grandiose feeling to the game.

On the subject of IX, it is a really fun game, but I can't recomend it for one simple reason: it has fucking level-scaling. The multiplayer nature of the game is a double edged sword, while it is really cool to play with your friend and level up together, the fact that they had to implement some scaling on how much exp each will gain based on your level was a massive deal breaker for me because, for some reason, it also extends for the single player, so yes if you want to pick a new character to level up, you can't rush their level, they'll receive the same amount of xp if they defeated an enemy of the same level.
 
Last edited:
Regarding DQXI... why "any, as long as it’s the Definitive Edition"?

Is the original version that bad?
I got it on Steam the day it released on PC, and never finished it... I was planning to go back to it, but perhaps I should play the Definitive Version instead.
 
Dragon Quest II is grindy as hell
I disagree, DQ2 being grindy is just a myth, same goes for most nes rpgs. It only BECOMES grindy if you use a guide that tells you where to go (most people do this), if you play with only the game's manual, figuring out what to do on your own, you'll naturally gain the necessary levels as you wander through the game's world and explore.

You also failed to mention the strange localizations of the three ds remakes which might put off a lot people given how heavy on weird accents they are. Those who want a more faithful localization of IV, V and VI should just play the original versions (or the ps2 version in V's case).

Another important thing to note is that the western DS version of IV cuts the party chat feature so beware. The mobile version actually includes it and there's a fan path that adds it to the DS version so be sure to download that if you care.
 
Last edited:
You also failed to mention the strange localizations of the three ds remakes which might put off a lot people given how heavy on weird accents they are. Those who want a more faithful localization of IV, V and VI should just play the original versions (or the ps2 version V's case).
Nice DQV PS2 shout. Really cool version.
 
It's too bad about the availability of these games to current platforms. For some reason, they don't want to put any of their backlog on PC. The DS remakes should find their way there at least.

VIII is long overdue for a modern port, and V for a 3D remake that actually animates things.
 
It's too bad about the availability of these games to current platforms. For some reason, they don't want to put any of their backlog on PC. The DS remakes should find their way there at least.
While I think there's little reason to port any games that you can easily emulate on your pc, ports of ds games that make these games playable on a single screen are great.
For example, even though they have a lot of issues, the Etrian Odyssey pc ports did exactly that and that's cool.
 
Damn, this was a great idea for an article, I love it.

This is probably weird, but the first Dragon Warrior is the only one I've ever finished? Which, I suppose, makes that the most accessible one in my opinion. I've tried 2, 3, 7, 8, and 11, but I've never managed to stay invested.
 
Regarding DQXI... why "any, as long as it’s the Definitive Edition"?

Is the original version that bad?
I got it on Steam the day it released on PC, and never finished it... I was planning to go back to it, but perhaps I should play the Definitive Version instead.
It's not bad but the Definitive Edition is much better because it's the same... but better. The addition of the character stories at the beginning of the second act justify playing that version over the original. Also has an actual postgame.
Post automatically merged:

I disagree, DQ2 being grindy is just a myth, same goes for most nes rpgs. It only BECOMES grindy if you use a guide that tells you where to go (most people do this), if you play with only the game's manual, figuring out what to do on your own, you'll naturally gain the necessary levels as you wander through the game's world and explore.
I can assure you the grind that I had to go through at the end is real and it's pretty much what killed the game for me. TO BE FAIR I don't actually remember the amount of grind before that. I think my brain suppressed everything else in favor of the final part.
Post automatically merged:

You also failed to mention the strange localizations of the three ds remakes which might put off a lot people given how heavy on weird accents they are. Those who want a more faithful localization of IV, V and VI should just play the original versions (or the ps2 version in V's case).

I wouldn't know about the English localization because I played the DS games in Spanish and although they retain the accents they are much more manageable because they are not accents, but languages. Frankly it makes me happy that the first island in the 3DS remake of Dragon Quest VII is Galicia (where I was born and reside). Rarely does the "language" become an issue to me.
Post automatically merged:

You said that VII was boring and couldn't recommend it as a starting point, which fair enough it does take a long time before the action starts, but personally it's my favorite of the series, I really enjoy the episodic nature of the game, and the whole setting of these random children being tasked with rebuilding the world one slab of stone at a time, really gives a grandiose feeling to the game.

I actually like VII, but until you get the vocations the characters aren't very interesting to use.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

latest_articles

Online statistics

Members online
147
Guests online
272
Total visitors
419

Forum statistics

Threads
3,367
Messages
61,953
Members
218,631
Latest member
Dsan

Support us

Back
Top