Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="MasterEn, post: 301767, member: 3287"] i think it works to an extent. game series do change over time. final fantasy went from being round based to turn based to hack 'n slash over the course of time. they had more entries to let people get adjusted but the same thing happened. the quadrilogy was meant to emulate old school mmos to enhance the setting of the game, which can have a frantic kinetic sense of energy to them. with the trilogy games focusing on story more, you would have to tone down some of the other elements of gameplay. i do like the fact that they explain the changes in game instead of it just being ignored or acting like it always like that. they didn't have to do that, but they did; unlike nintendo with tears of the kingdom and breath of the wild. i would argue the opposite; you need to play the first set of games since the sequel builds upon some of the plot elements and a couple of character arcs that start up at the start of the series. i will state it as a fact; anyone telling you to skip the first set of games because they are "clunky" or "old and/or outdated", game overed fighting the data bug in the dungeon that mia invites you to go to alone before joining up with you. [/QUOTE]

Totals may include hidden visitors.