New posts

Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="qw90700, post: 269824, member: 660650"] Well I played CyberJunk 2077's day 1 version and the version released like a year ago (2.12), so I can say comparing to day 1 the game got really playable and I'm not just talking about bugs. First version was really like an Alpha build lots of people used to play in game test programs, it was that bad. So, as far as I know 2.12 and from now on is playable. Game is fine tuned and added features like you can block bullets like a jedi with your katana which do add fun gameplay on its own. The obvious junk aspect of the game is corrected. Some side quest stuff were added and all so the game doesn't feel so pointless and empty anymore. But would I say the game worth paying money? Nope. The game is still a junk mess in terms of bad design choices like they are some indie developer and what junk left they didn't fix beyond bugs because it's lack of vision at this point. It only serves me to create memes from this junk game and that's all about it. For example lol: [MEDIA=youtube]e9AS1ogzzwo[/MEDIA] [MEDIA=youtube]4NRzsaJd3v4[/MEDIA] [MEDIA=youtube]RpCVxFZXGfw[/MEDIA] [MEDIA=youtube]K0FOd_kRWhA[/MEDIA] The game is still a hot mess just because bad decisions, not "bugs". For example Bethesda games were always hot mess but it wasn't because of bad design choices. This game is just some fancy and expensive the most overrated indie quality trash with AAA budget lol. If this topic was about "the games you are surprised how disappointing they were" then CyberJunk 2077 would be my top 1 even suppressing Duke Nuken Forever and Metal Gear Solid 5 BS lol. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Online statistics

Members online: 157

Guests online: 447

Total visitors: 604

Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads: 10,598

Messages: 261,710

Members: 840,076

Latest member: r3tr0m4nc3r85

Reply to thread

Online statistics

Forum statistics

Advertisers