Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Lena CE, post: 258155, member: 26523"] I wouldn't say a lack of ambition equals something mid. But I'd also disagree that Kirby was all that experimental beyond its fundamentals (infinite jumps and copy abilities) that never really changed. Kirby as a franchise has always been pretty unambitious from its inception. If that core connects with you, you love the pink fluffball. People can certainly point to differences between the entries but ultimately it is one of the most samey and safe franchises in all of video games. It doesn't even have the spin-off series that Mega Man does to save it from similar critiques despite the games within those subseries being incredibly safe and similar to one another (minus the X series cause that did have some big shakeups). You look at NES or early SNES era Kirby and nothing really changed between then and now as far as 2D installments go. Even within the NES to SNES era the games remained largely the same even though I do think that installments like SS and KA3 did at least try to do things a little differently. [/QUOTE]

Totals may include hidden visitors.