Clarification of Rule #5

[Glimbo]

The first part of the rule says: "No Piracy linking on discussion threads"

But from what I've seen get moved and removed, it should read more like:
"No piracy linking, reference to piracy websites, or discussion of piracy."

Is this correct?

 

[Yousef]

The first part of the rule says: "No Piracy linking on discussion threads"

But from what I've seen get moved and removed, it should read more like:
"No piracy linking, reference to piracy websites, or discussion of piracy."

Is this correct?

Yeah, this is how they’re managed, and I like this wording a lot, so I’m curious what the other mods think.

 

[Dyne]

"No piracy linking, reference to piracy websites, or discussion of piracy."

"You'd best start believing in piracy websites, you're on one!"

Post automatically merged: Thursday at 2:04 AM

Preservation. I meant preservation.
Yes.

 

[Spike's iconSpike]

I don't think talking about it or mentioning a site is a big deal, It would be hypocritic to act like GBATemp in here.
However I don't want links in the wild they should be kept on the repo because that section is for members only and doesn't show up on google and such.
So yeah you can talk about it and even mention sites.

 

[Glimbo]

I don't think talking about it or mentioning a site is a big deal, It would be hypocritic to act like GBATemp in here.
However I don't want links in the wild they should be kept on the repo because that section is for members only and doesn't show up on google and such.
So yeah you can talk about it and even mention sites.

Okay, thanks for clearing it up.