New posts

Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Deleted member 420614, post: 172021, member: 420614"] Agree on that but not only anti-consumer it´s a hard blow for the creators as well. It´s not predatory but it´s anti-consumer and just pure bullshit. It´s not good for gamers when they are trying to force them to own 2-3 system jst to play a bloody game. I mean take third party titles like Xenogear 3 or Bayonetta 3 they both sold around 2-3 million copies. Imagine if they where not console exclusive they maybe not have sold 20millions copies but maybe 5-7million being on all systems including pc. I mean if I made a game I would love for allot of people to play it. But no a Company with a stick up their ass want´s to sell more units of their consoles is more important. Man gotta suck for the devs. If your system can´t sell untis of it´s own merits to the point you need to lock games to it then means your system is worthless then maybe you should not be making consoles and focus on only making games. ------------------------------------------- Anyway these 2 new from soft games seams questionable if you ask me I mean both being PVPVE looking at past games PVP has never been their strong suit with all server issues and lag and cheating. Also as a fan of the series my self I never loved the games for the invasions mechanics I love it becuse im sick of games always feel the need to hold my hand. Take FF16 I recently finsihed that game so easy I finished it on hard with out dying a single time. Or other JRPG today that love to fully heal and revive your party every time you stop at a save spot. We may never get a bloodborn 2 or maybe even a normal souls like game. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Online statistics

Members online: 111

Guests online: 179

Total visitors: 290

Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads: 10,247

Messages: 254,170

Members: 815,932

Latest member: Arjeyyy

Reply to thread

Online statistics

Forum statistics

Advertisers