- Joined
- Oct 20, 2024
- Messages
- 6,033
- Solutions
- 27
- Reaction score
- 29,631
- Points
- 11,177
- Location
- Vossen Estate 🇦🇷❗
I'm from a market that was never Nintendo's to take -- everyone from low and middle class incomes chose the Genesis instead each and every time, with most people "graduating" to the PS1 a few years after. It really did seem that most people's last Nintendo console was the NES, with some bold ones snatching the Gameboy + Camera package when that released (and even those were a fringe minority).
However, I DID know a few people who owned the SNES during the tail end of the 16-Bit era, getting the console at a huge discount while unsold inventory was being cleared to make room for the next best thing.
But almost no-one ever went for the next console on that lineage, citing the unaffordability of the cartridges, the atrocious release the whole system was subjected to (it didn't make it here until late 1999, according to an old magazine of mine) and the fact that the PS1 had been outshining it for years, dominating both the home and rental markets with all the brutality of an invasion.
I only ever knew one N64 owner at the time, and he was a foreigner who just happened to travel with it.
Then I never met anyone who owned a GameCube, either
And the very first Wii I saw was near the end of its life cycle as well.
I can understand those systems not making a splash here when cheaper alternatives were available (and I do recall buying a brand new Model I Genesis for $200 when the SNES sitting right next to it was priced $350), but it's the lack of celebration for all those machines that gets me.
Even if very few people actually owned it, reviewers and the public alike paid it a LOT of attention to the Super Nintendo, with even one TV show focusing entirely on its catalog. I never saw that kind of praise for subsequent systems, getting the Saturn/Jaguar treatment instead: "we know they exist, but don't ask us to care".
And that? That was really odd for me even at the time.
However, I DID say that this was never a Nintendo market, so maybe this wasn't the case elsewhere.
Was it?
However, I DID know a few people who owned the SNES during the tail end of the 16-Bit era, getting the console at a huge discount while unsold inventory was being cleared to make room for the next best thing.
But almost no-one ever went for the next console on that lineage, citing the unaffordability of the cartridges, the atrocious release the whole system was subjected to (it didn't make it here until late 1999, according to an old magazine of mine) and the fact that the PS1 had been outshining it for years, dominating both the home and rental markets with all the brutality of an invasion.
I only ever knew one N64 owner at the time, and he was a foreigner who just happened to travel with it.
Then I never met anyone who owned a GameCube, either
And the very first Wii I saw was near the end of its life cycle as well.
I can understand those systems not making a splash here when cheaper alternatives were available (and I do recall buying a brand new Model I Genesis for $200 when the SNES sitting right next to it was priced $350), but it's the lack of celebration for all those machines that gets me.
Even if very few people actually owned it, reviewers and the public alike paid it a LOT of attention to the Super Nintendo, with even one TV show focusing entirely on its catalog. I never saw that kind of praise for subsequent systems, getting the Saturn/Jaguar treatment instead: "we know they exist, but don't ask us to care".
And that? That was really odd for me even at the time.
However, I DID say that this was never a Nintendo market, so maybe this wasn't the case elsewhere.
Was it?